Saturday, December 20, 2008

Responsibilities of Government?

What are the responsibilities of government? According to the Constitution of the United States, they are as follows:

1. Form a more perfect union.
2. Establish justice.
3. Insure domestic tranquility.
4. Provide for the common defense.
5. Promote the general welfare.
6. Secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.

Unfortunately, these do not really tell you very much. Establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, and provide for common defense seem pretty clear. Forming a more perfect union is very abstract and, I think, not entirely clear. In this respect it is similar to securing the blessings of liberty…It is "promoting the general welfare" that I believe is far too general, at least for me. For example, I should think that promoting the general welfare would mean providing health care for all. My view is apparently not shared by those in government as we have some 47 million citizens without such care. We do have medicare and Medicaid, begrudgingly given, and still not wanted by some. This is fine, but a drop in the bucket compared to what is needed.

I should think promoting the general welfare would also include seeing to it that no one has to go hungry or starve. As I see ads all the time to help hungry children, and I am told that millions go to bed at night hungry, and so on, it seems our government does not interpret this the way I would. Why should I, without too many means, have to provide for hungry children in the richest country on earth? While on the one hand I feel guilty when I cannot personally solve the hunger problem, on the other I am angry as hell because I believe this should be a governmental responsibility. I am also informed, from time to time, that our elderly are sometimes reduced to eating dog and cat food, or having to choose between paying their rent and paying for their prescription drugs. It’s true we have social security, a blessing, but still hated by some who would like to take it away. Is this their idea of promoting the general welfare?

Similarly, I receive request all the time for donations to save the whales, the dolphins, the polar bears, the spotted owl, elephants, puffins, pygmy rabbits, sage grouse, etc., etc. etc. Why should it be my responsibility to save all these wonderful creatures? Isn’t looking out for them and insuring their well-being promoting the general welfare? Apparently not, our government chooses to promote the general welfare of huge corporations instead. This, too, leaves me very angry.

And what about maintaining and improving our infrastructure? While I do not get requests to personally contribute for this, I certainly have to pay taxes which presumably should be used at least in part for this purpose. But for more than fifty years it has not. Maintainting infrastructure, bridges, highways, schools, public buildings and so on clearly contributes to the general welfare. Where has government been?

Speaking of schools, one would think that a functioning democracy would only be as good as its informed citizens. But our citizens have been increasingly uninformed for years, with no emphasis placed on education and the affordability ebbing away even faster than ordinary inflation. We have become a nation of television addicts, with television programming so dismal for the most part that even semi-intelligent people cannot bear to watch it. Anti-intellectualism is rampant and even our beautiful language is being corrupted. Bush’s question, “is our children learning” sums it up quite well. While we used to lead the world in education, we have fallen badly behind in subjects that are absolutely crucial to survival in the modern world. Under the Bush/Cheney administration science has been replaced with religious fairy tales of one kind or another. Any society where a majority doesn’t believe in evolution is not going to survive for long in the 21st century, except perhaps, as a pitiful nation that once was a player on the international stage.

One only has to look at “providing for the common defense” to learn where our emphasis is and has been for a long time. We not only provide for our common defense, we revel in it, roll in it, overdo it to the point of absurdity, suck it up like catnip. With a defense budget larger than all the rest of the world combined we certainly provide for our common defense, and provide, and provide, and provide. This is so excessive, so insane, so obsessive, it seems to be designed for a science fiction “war of the worlds” rather than any realistic hostilities that could possibly happen here on earth.

Finally, our belief in free market capitalism, is basically opposed to promoting the general welfare of our citizens. Marx predicted long ago that under unregulated capitalism corporations and the wealthy would eventually cannibalize the workers. We have just witnessed the proof of Marx’s theory. Basic necessities like air and water and food and energy and transportation and health care are too important to be left to privatization and an unregulated market system. Let the capitalists concentrate on cosmetics and tobacco and liquor and such and let the rest of us try to live more sensibly. There are social democracies that work well while protecting their citizens from the greed and avarice of unregulated capitalism. They may have their flaws, but they, at least, are on the right track. We are not.

LKBIQ:
[Feminism is] a socialist, anti-family, political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians.
Pat Robertson

TILT:
Cary Grant’s real name was Archibald Alec Leach.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

"What are the responsibilities of government...."

With all due respect, this reasoning is totally backwards. The issue is NOT one of responsibilities. The issue is of power. What power does government have to do anything? The people created a Constitution which in turn created a government of enumerated and very limited powers. Here are some of those powers exercisable by Congress as enumerated in the Constitution:
-lay and collect Taxes;
-borrow Money;
-regulate Commerce among the states;
-establish uniform Rule of Naturalization;
-establish uniform Laws of Bankruptcies;
-coin Money;
-declare War;
-raise and support Armies;
-etc.

Ultimately, everything in life centers around power and who has it. Some people always want more, and some people willingly give it to them. Over and over again.... Until they have no more power to give, and the recipients of said power have no need to share because they have all the power. Every decision that one makes and every position that one holds affects the flow of power and who possesses it and what is done with power. If one shows up to negotiate with mere intentions and desires, but no power, no one will listen.


"It’s true we have social security, a blessing...."

Social security is the ultimate ponzi scheme. It is exactly like the Madoff Hedge fund collapse that happened in New York last week. A ponzi scheme is a system of money pay outs that appears to be self-sustaining, but it is not. It relies on new people constantly paying into the system to support those who are drawing from the system. It is also known as a pyramid scheme. If the number of new payers into the system ever declines, the whole scheme collapses. Ponzi schemes are illegal. Interesting, this is exactly how social security works. Current workers pay money into the system and all of the money is routed out to current retirees. There is no saving of any money within the social security system. The system appears to work as long as more and more people enter the work force and pay into the system to support those who are retired. It was known from the beginning that the scheme would work for a limited number of years before it would break down due to there being too many retirees and not enough workers. We are a matter of years away from the time when there are not enough workers to support the number of retirees. It is a scheme that is guaranteed to fail. All ponzi schemes ultimately collapse, and social "security" is no different. Actually, it is different because while ponzi schemes are generally quite illegal, Social Security has a law saying that it is legal. Unfortunately, this law does not have the power to make Social Security viable. This is why the most recent Comptroller of the Currency resigned before his term was up. He wanted to be on the record as saying that the whole thing is going to collapse before it actually does collapse. He knows that it is close to collapse, and he is creating a historical record for himself in which he avoids blame because he warned everyone ahead of time.


"There are social democracies that work well while protecting their citizens from the greed and avarice of unregulated capitalism. They may have their flaws, but they, at least, are on the right track."

The social democracies are likewise approaching the hour of judgment. The excesses that have allowed them to create the appearance of workable social democracies are drawing to a close. These excesses were created by two things: the US defeat of totalitarianism in WWII and cheap oil due to western-led development of oil reserves throughout the world. The reason these excesses are drawing to a close is because totalitarianism is re-emerging throughout the world as governments lose legitimacy due to corruption, self-dealing, and failed efforts at centralized planning. Also, the era of cheap, easily accessible oil is also drawing to a close because all of the easy reserves are almost all exhausted. US oil production fell off a cliff beginning in the 1970s due to depletion. Mexico's key oil field and second largest in the world, Canterrel, appears to be crashing. North Sea oil production has fallen off a cliff. There are not sufficient new discoveries to make up for the decline in existing fields. We are in trouble.

So, it all comes down to power. What do we have the power to do? Do we have the power to consume more than we produce? Do we have the power to give everyone [fill in the blank]? The answer is "NO." The westernized world has experienced a temporary respite from the harsh realities of this world due to a temporary lack of totalitarian regimes and a temporary abundance of cheap, extremely potent energy in the form of oil. The world is in the process of reverting back to "business as usual" because totalitarianism is on the rise again (even in the western world and here in the USA) and because large quantities of cheap energy are in danger of depletion. The wars and infringements under the Bush regime are just the beginning. The incoming administration is going to continue these policies and take them to a whole new level. As a result, be careful about giving up any power that you possess to anyone else, including government. Any power you give up to others WILL be used by them against you. The issue is of power. It is always about power....