“I am afeard
there are few die well that die in battle, for how can they charitably dispose
of anything when blood is their argument?”
I confess that whenever I see
this quote (not very often, I confess) I immediately think of John McCain and
his loyal sidekick, Lindsey Graham, who seem to epitomize the sentiment
contained in this statement. There is apparently no situation that, according
to these two, cannot be solved by immediately turning to violence. And when the
violence is over, and they cannot charitably dispose of anything, they solve
this by simply moving on to the next senseless acts of violence, or, I guess,
they would if they had their way. This seems to be related to the idea of an
American Empire, an empire that can be made possible only through the use of
our advanced military prowess and our sense of entitlement. Of course we should
dominate the globe, change governments to better suit our taste, get rid of
those who do not comply with our wishes (and greed), and spread democracy (and
Christianity) around the globe. Our American “Exceptionalism” is justification
enough, as we are that “shining beacon on the hill,” the “greatest nation on
earth,” the world’s only “superpower,” with “the highest standard of living on
earth,” or at least we did once upon a time as I think that may not be any
longer true.
I find it amazing that
Shakespeare somehow anticipated United States Foreign Policy in the 20th
and 21st centuries, when the United States did not yet exist. It
does seem to me we have not “charitably disposed of anything” even after all
these years of violence and war. In matters such as this we seem to be slipping
farther and farther behind, especially in recent years. Remarkable how we could
have spent so much money, time, and blood for such little reward. Tell me, if
you will, what it is we have accomplished in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, and
Afghanistan, to say nothing of all the other bloodshed in which we have been
involved. Have we made the world a better place, profited from our bloodshed,
spread democracy, “won hearts and minds,” what?
Once again those who use
blood for their argument are pressuring for war against Iran, for military
involvement in Syria, for supporting Israeli war crimes, to become more
involved in African violence, to stay
forever in Afghanistan, to send our killing drones wherever we wish and against
whatever targets we choose, and so on and on and on, a veritable carnival of
blood and violence. I’m pretty sure that we and our Israeli “buddies” are now
considered by most other people to be the major obstacle to peace on the planet
(and for good reason).
Curiously enough, although
President Obama has blood on his hands, what with Afghanistan and his drones, he
has also been opposed to war with Iran (in spite of intense pressure from
Israel and their toadies), and is also resisting intense pressure from the
merchants of blood to intervene in Syria. I think he should be given credit for
this, but his schizophrenic foreign policy remains a mystery to me (perhaps to
him as well).
No comments:
Post a Comment